From a former evaluator: I've assessed many responses across a wide range of scenarios and question types. The ones that land at the bottom are rarely written by people who lack empathy or good judgment — they're usually written by people who haven't been told what evaluators are actually looking for. That's a preparation problem, not a character problem, and it's fixable.

CASPer does not produce a percentage or a pass mark. Instead, your responses are scored by trained evaluators and your overall result is placed into one of four quartiles, based on how you performed relative to everyone else who took the same test.

1st Quartile
Lowest scoring group
2nd Quartile
Below average
3rd Quartile
Above average
4th Quartile
Highest scoring group

A low CASPer score typically means landing in the 1st quartile — your responses ranked lower than the majority of applicants. The 2nd quartile is below average but less likely to be a significant barrier, depending on the program and its weighting of CASPer.

Programs receive your quartile, not your raw score or individual response ratings. What they do with it varies — some use CASPer as one of several factors, others use it as a screening threshold before reviewing the rest of your application.

One of the most consistent patterns I noticed while scoring is that academic ability does not predict CASPer performance. Students with strong GPAs and impressive applications regularly land in the 1st quartile — not because they lack good values, but because they approach CASPer the wrong way.

⚠️
Treating it like an academic test
CASPer rewards genuine reasoning and empathy, not the "correct" answer. Students used to finding the right answer often write responses that sound polished but feel detached — they've optimized for sounding good rather than engaging authentically.
⚠️
Skipping perspectives to get to the solution
High-achievers are often problem-solvers by instinct. In CASPer, jumping to a solution before acknowledging everyone's situation is one of the clearest signals of a low-scoring response — it looks like the writer has only considered their own viewpoint.
⚠️
Not practicing under time pressure
Writing a thoughtful response with unlimited time is a different skill from writing under 3 minutes 30 seconds of real pressure. Students who haven't practiced timed responses often run out of time mid-answer, leaving responses incomplete — which consistently limits scores.
⚠️
Underestimating how different CASPer is
Many students assume that because they're thoughtful, empathetic people, CASPer will come naturally. It often doesn't — not because they lack those qualities, but because demonstrating them clearly in writing, under time pressure, to a complete stranger, is a specific skill that needs practice.

See where your responses are landing. Practice with real evaluator feedback — built by a former evaluator with firsthand experience assessing real responses, who knows exactly what moves a score from low to high.

Practice Free →

A low CASPer quartile is not a verdict on your character or your suitability for your chosen field. It reflects how your responses read to an evaluator on that particular test day — and that is something you can change.

The most important thing is to understand why your responses scored the way they did, rather than simply practicing more of the same. If you don't know what's causing the low scores, more practice just reinforces the same patterns.

Getting feedback from someone who understands how CASPer is evaluated is the fastest route to meaningful improvement. Response Method's feedback is built around the same criteria that trained evaluators apply. It tells you specifically where your responses are falling short and what to focus on, rather than giving you generic tips.

If you are retaking CASPer in a future cycle, give yourself enough preparation time to build new habits — not just read more about the test. Two to four weeks of structured, timed practice with honest review is consistently more effective than cramming in the days before your test.

Find out where your responses stand

Free timed practice with instant feedback — built by a former evaluator who knows what separates low from high responses.

Start Free Practice →

Typed practice free · Premium feedback available


Scoring in the 1st quartile is generally considered a low CASPer score. It means your responses ranked lower than the majority of applicants who took the same test. Some programs use CASPer as a screening tool, so a 1st quartile score can limit which programs seriously consider your application.

Not automatically. Many programs consider CASPer alongside GPA, personal statements, references, and interviews. A low quartile is one factor in the decision, not the only one. That said, some programs do use CASPer as a threshold filter, so the impact varies depending on where you are applying.

Yes. CASPer can be retaken in a subsequent application cycle. Scores are not typically carried over between cycles, so retaking with better preparation gives you a genuine opportunity to improve your quartile.

CASPer does not measure academic ability. High-achieving students often underperform because they approach it like an academic test — trying to give the "correct" answer rather than demonstrating genuine empathy and reasoning. The most common reasons for low scores are not considering multiple perspectives, not explaining the reasoning behind decisions, and running out of time before answering fully.